Meeting Lynne Truss

Today our class had a lovely workshop with none other than the Queen of punctuation, Lynne Truss! It was wonderful to hear the thoughts of such a humble yet astonishing figure. After the workshop she proceeded to have a short presentation about grammar, followed by a discussion with Jeanette Winterson. Punctuation makes a difference – mind you – and it’s easy to forget, at times, that a single misplaced blob of ink (or a wandering pixel) could change the meaning of a sentence. I am sure you have come across unintentional hilarity several times when revising your own work. It happens rather easy, doesn’t it? Well, you’re not alone. Once I get cracking on some extra-curricular reading I set myself ‘ll get her famous book Eats, Shoots & Leaves.

Eats, shoots and leaves

Meanwhile I’ll trust my instincts and auto-correct. Speaking of auto-correct: Both Jeanette and Lynne wrote with it turned off. I get it, it’s annoying to have blue underlines everywhere, but it also helps me catch an amazing number of mistakes. Maybe I’ll turn it off when I’m 70 and can write like Cormac Mccarthy.

I also recently came across a new service which is said to be even better than the grammar checker in Word. It’s called Grammarly. Does it work? I don’t know… Let’s try it out!

There we go! It found a few things that Word never picked up on (it pointed out to me that I had written “won” instead of “own”). This is interesting. Maybe I found my new favourite editor?

I use Grammarly’s grammar check because Word gives me angry blue lines and beeping noises when it thinks I’m wrong.

Oh, and by the way, you should check out Lynne’s book! If there’s buzz, there’s a buzzing (Hah! That was lame).

Tags: , ,

About fhhakansson

Follow the up-and-coming science fiction author from Sweden as he shares his creative visions, his every day life, and journey to authorship.

2 responses to “Meeting Lynne Truss”

  1. 4amWriter says :

    I am going to pick on you for a minute, only because I know you won’t be offended. You wrote, “I am sure you have come across unintentional hilarity several times when revision your own work.”

    Instead of ‘revision’, of course it should read, ‘revising’.

    The problem with computer programs is that they fail to analyze the context of the sentences sometimes. Not all the time, but often enough where it isn’t foolproof.

    Human eyes and knowledge of correct grammar/punctuation are still the best tools in editing, IMO.

    You’re not offended, right? ;)

    • fhhakansson says :

      Speaking of hilarity, haha! Thank you for finding that one. And here I thought I kept my eyes open! Maybe I was too trusting in the machine?
      It is just as you say, and just as you just proved, humans are the best editors ;) Hurray for us!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,580 other followers

%d bloggers like this: